Division rival's impending fire sale would be perfect for Padres, but won't happen

As the MLB trade deadline barrels toward us, the Arizona Diamondbacks are inching closer to a soft reset — and the San Diego Padres should be the team paying closest attention.

Arizona is quietly sitting on a goldmine of trade chips. From Eugenio Suárez, arguably the best bat on the market — to Josh Naylor, versatile outfielders like Alek Thomas, Lourdes Gurriel Jr., and Jake McCarthy. The Diamondbacks have exactly what the Padres need. San Diego’s lineup is desperate for more reinforcements if they want to stay afloat in the NL West. The D-backs’ roster could offer them solutions on multiple fronts: power, depth, and outfield defense.

On paper, it’s a perfect match. But in practice? It’s a pipe dream.

NL West politics could block Padres from ideal trade deadline moves

The Padres and Diamondbacks may share a division, but they might as well be trade partners from two separate galaxies. These teams just don’t deal with each other. In fact, they’ve only completed four trades in the history of their franchises, the most recent happening over a decade ago.

Here’s the full (and laughably short) ledger of trades between San Diego and Arizona:

• July 31, 2013: D-backs trade Ian Kennedy to the Padres for Matt Stites and Joe Thatcher.
• May 2, 2012: Padres purchase Tommy Layne from the D-backs.
• July 17, 2008: Padres send Tony Clark to Arizona for Evan Scribner.
• July 27, 2007: Arizona ships Scott Hairston to the Padres for Leo Rosales.

That’s the entire history of collaboration between the two teams. This isn’t just bad luck or missed connections — it’s by design. Division rivals are notoriously reluctant to strengthen one another, especially at the deadline. No GM wants to be responsible for arming a neighbor with a weapon that could knock them out of a playoff race. In the hyper-competitive NL West, where the margins are razor-thin and wild-card tiebreakers can come down to head-to-head records, helping out your rival isn’t just frowned upon and can be seen as front office malpractice.

Sure, the Diamondbacks may be entering seller mode, but don’t mistake it for a rebuild. This is a pivot, not a teardown. They’re dealing from a position of control, not desperation. Even if it’s just for a two-month rental, they’re not going to ship out talent to a team they still believe they’re on even footing with.

The Padres, meanwhile, are working with a relatively weak farm system. Their best pitching prospects are either injured, years away, or already dealt. The D-backs have made it clear they want young, controllable arms in return. And while San Diego could try to piece together a package, the truth is the D-backs can find better returns elsewhere.

So yes, this is the kind of fire sale that should make Padres fans salivate. It’s a perfect storm of availability, need, and talent. But when it comes to actually making a deal? History and division politics say it’s never going to happen.

More San Diego Padres News and Rumors