Padres’ Yu Darvish saga exposes the harsh reality of retirement negotiations

Ken Rosenthal gave us a deeper dive into why the situation with Darvish is so complicated.
San Diego Padres v Seattle Mariners
San Diego Padres v Seattle Mariners | Steph Chambers/GettyImages

When the Padres learned that they would be without Yu Darvish for all of 2026, they were devastated. The team didn’t only lose out on his talent, but also the leadership he displayed on the field.

Ahead of the not-so-great news, the Padres had already lost Dylan Cease to free agency and were missing vital parts of the rotation. Losing out on Darvish only added insult to injury.

Darvish, 39, underwent internal brace surgery in his throwing elbow, something that is not easy to come back from at such an age. This led to Darvish making one of the most difficult decisions an athlete could make, and that was opting to retire.

Padres’ Yu Darvish retirement chatter uncovers a harsh negotiation reality

However, Darvish went out and publicly stated that he had not yet finalized his decision, saying some parts needed to be worked out.

Those “parts” are the remaining $43 million in his contract. Will Darvish forfeit the remaining money in favor of retirement? There are reasons to believe so, but Ken Rosenthal of The Athletic explained why it may be far-fetched for him to opt out of all that money.

Rosenthal explained how it was easier to forfeit money on the short term, such as a one-year contract. The difference between that and Darvish’s situation is that there are three years on his deal, and forfeiting that much money over a longer period of time is harder to do.

Darvish signed a six-year, $108 million contract extension with the Padres in 2023, setting him up to be a free agent in 2029.

Over the course of five years with the Padres organization, Darvish posted a 3.97 ERA over 651 innings pitched.

The official details are still getting sorted out between the Padres front office, Darvish, and his agent, John Wolfe. But as Rosenthal explained, it is hard to void so much money over a long-term contract, and it will be interesting to see how the two parties put this situation to rest.

Loading recommendations... Please wait while we load personalized content recommendations