The Padres already paid for Casey Mize once. We don’t necessarily believe they should pay for him again. His disappointing time in San Diego should leave the Padres looking for a more dependable rotation option in 2027. Bringing him back would require more than just a little convincing. And the fact that we surrendered prospects to get him doesn’t qualify.
Those players are gone. Another contract won’t justify the move, nor would it bring those players back. All it would do is give the Padres another bill. We should be comfortable saying the trade fell short and just move on.
Padres should move on from Casey Mize after disappointing deadline trade
There was a purpose behind acquiring Mize. The Padres were looking for more starting pitching in order to contend. The return didn’t deliver what the Padres needed. Sometimes that happens, an aggressive front office is likely to miss from time to time.
The trouble starts when the next decision becomes an attempt to defend the previous one. Familiarity can make a reunion feel easier to sell. But we’ve seen Mize in a Padres uniform now. That experience should sharpen the evaluation, and his audition gave us little reason to pencil him into a dependable rotation.
A.J. Preller’s job this winter is to build a rotation we can trust in 2027, and Mize’s audition gave us plenty to question. In 10 Padres starts, he posted a 7.46 ERA across 44 2/3 innings.
The problems went deeper than the ERA. Mize surrendered 13 home runs and finished with just 25 strikeouts against 19 walks.
Ten starts won’t tell us everything about Mize’s future, especially with health complicating the evaluation. He sprained his right ankle in August after slipping on the dugout steps. That deserves consideration when we assess his disappointing finish.
Detroit had also scratched his final scheduled start before the trade, but that move was explicitly described as a non-injury precaution. We shouldn’t rewrite it as proof the Tigers shipped San Diego an injured pitcher. Without cooking up a conspiracy, an injury explanation doesn’t mean Mize will suddenly give the Padres reliable innings in 2027. A reunion would require confidence in both his health and his ability to pitch effectively once he takes the mound.
A discounted contract can still become expensive if the Padres have to spend again to replace him. Mize’s brief stint gave us enough concerns about his health and performance to look elsewhere first. If he’s still available with spring training approaching, a cheap prove-it deal could make sense, provided San Diego has already secured more dependable rotation options. Anything beyond that, and the Padres should keep it moving.
